Old English

Old English
Native name
Pronunciation	Template:IPA
Spoken in
Region	England (except Cornwall and the extreme north-west), southern and eastern Scotland, and some localities in the eastern fringes of modern Wales
Ethnicity	Anglo-Saxons
Native speakers
Date
Language family
Writing system	Runic, later Latin (Old English Latin alphabet)
Official status
Regulated by
ISO 639-1
ISO 639-2	ang
ISO 639-3	ang
Glottolog	olde1238
Linguasphere

Old English (Template:Lang or Template:Lang, Template:IPA or Template:IPA), or Anglo-Saxon, is the earliest recorded form of the English language, spoken in England and southern and eastern Scotland in the Early Middle Ages. It developed from the languages brought to Great Britain by Anglo-Saxon settlers in the mid-5th century, and the first Old English literature dates from the mid-7th century. After the Norman Conquest of 1066, English was replaced for several centuries by Anglo-Norman (a type of French) as the language of the upper classes. This is regarded as marking the end of the Old English era, since during the subsequent period the English language was heavily influenced by Anglo-Norman, developing into what is now known as Middle English in England and Early Scots in Scotland.

Old English developed from a set of Anglo-Frisian or Ingvaeonic dialects originally spoken by Germanic tribes traditionally known as the Angles, Saxons and Jutes. As the Germanic settlers became dominant in England, their language replaced the languages of Roman Britain: Common Brittonic, a Celtic language; and Latin, brought to Britain by the Roman conquest. Old English had four main dialects, associated with particular Anglo-Saxon kingdoms: Kentish, Mercian, Northumbrian, and West Saxon. It was West Saxon that formed the basis for the literary standard of the later Old English period, although the dominant forms of Middle and Modern English would develop mainly from Mercian,Template:Citation needed and Scots from Northumbrian. The speech of eastern and northern parts of England was subject to strong Old Norse influence due to Scandinavian rule and settlement beginning in the 9th century.

Old English is one of the West Germanic languages, with its closest relatives being Old Frisian and Old Saxon. Like other old Germanic languages, it is very different from Modern English and Modern Scots, and largely incomprehensible for Modern English or Modern Scots speakers without study. Within Old English grammar nouns, adjectives, pronouns and verbs have many inflectional endings and forms, and word order is much freer. The oldest Old English inscriptions were written using a runic system, but from about the 8th century this was replaced by a version of the Latin alphabet.

Etymology

Template:Lang, from which the word English is derived, means 'pertaining to the Angles'. The Angles were one of the Germanic tribes who settled in many parts of Britain in the 5th century. By the 9th century, all speakers of Old English, including those who claimed Saxon or Jutish ancestry, could be referred to as Template:Lang.

This name probably either derives from Proto-Germanic Template:Wikt-lang, which referred to narrowness, constriction or anxiety, perhaps referring to shallow waters near the coast, or else it may derive from a related word Template:Wikt-lang which could refer to curve or hook shapes including fishing hooks. Concerning the second option, it has been hypothesised that the Angles acquired their name either because they lived on a curved promontory of land shaped like a fishhook, or else because they were fishermen (anglers).

History

West Germanic languages Template:Circa

The approximate extent of Germanic languages in the early 10th century: Template:Legend Template:Legend Template:Legend Template:Legend Template:Legend Template:Legend

Old English was not static, and its usage covered a period of 700 years, from the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain in the 5th century to the late 11th century, some time after the Norman Conquest. While indicating that the establishment of dates is an arbitrary process, Albert Baugh dates Old English from 450 to 1150, a period of full inflections, a synthetic language. Perhaps around 85% of Old English words are no longer in use, but those that survived are the basic elements of Modern English vocabulary.

Old English is a West Germanic language, and developed out of North Sea Germanic dialects from the 5th century. It came to be spoken over most of the territory of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms which became the Kingdom of England. This included most of present-day England, as well as part of what is now southeastern Scotland, which for several centuries belonged to the kingdom of Northumbria. Other parts of the island continued to use Celtic languages (GaelicTemplate:Sndand perhaps some PictishTemplate:Sndin most of Scotland, Medieval Cornish all over Cornwall and in adjacent parts of Devon, Cumbric perhaps to the 12th century in parts of Cumbria, and Welsh in Wales and possibly also on the English side of the Anglo-Welsh border); except in the areas of Scandinavian settlements, where Old Norse was spoken and Danish law applied.

Old English literacy developed after the Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England in the late 7th century. The oldest surviving work of Old English literature is Cædmon's Hymn, which was composed between 658 and 680 but not written down until the early 8th century. There is a limited corpus of runic inscriptions from the 5th to 7th centuries, but the oldest coherent runic texts (notably the inscriptions on the Franks Casket) date to the early 8th century. The Old English Latin alphabet was introduced around the 8th century.

Alfred the Great statue in Winchester, Hampshire. The 9th-century English King proposed that primary education be taught in English, with those wishing to advance to holy orders to continue their studies in Latin.

With the unification of several of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms (outside the Danelaw) by Alfred the Great in the later 9th century, the language of government and literature became standardised around the West Saxon dialect (Early West Saxon). Alfred advocated education in English alongside Latin, and had many works translated into the English language; some of them, such as Pope Gregory I's treatise Pastoral Care, appear to have been translated by Alfred himself. In Old English, typical of the development of literature, poetry arose before prose, but Alfred chiefly inspired the growth of prose.

A later literary standard, dating from the late 10th century, arose under the influence of Bishop Æthelwold of Winchester, and was followed by such writers as the prolific Ælfric of Eynsham ("the Grammarian"). This form of the language is known as the "Winchester standard", or more commonly as Late West Saxon. It is considered to represent the "classical" form of Old English. It retained its position of prestige until the time of the Norman Conquest, after which English ceased for a time to be of importance as a literary language.

The history of Old English can be subdivided into:

• Prehistoric Old English (Template:Circa); for this period, Old English is mostly a reconstructed language as no literary witnesses survive (with the exception of limited epigraphic evidence). This language, or closely related group of dialects, spoken by the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, and pre-dating documented Old English or Anglo-Saxon, has also been called Primitive Old English.
• Early Old English (Template:Circa), the period of the oldest manuscript traditions, with authors such as Cædmon, Bede, Cynewulf and Aldhelm.
• Late Old English (Template:Circa), the final stage of the language leading up to the Norman conquest of England and the subsequent transition to Early Middle English.

The Old English period is followed by Middle English (1150–1500), Early Modern English (1500–1650) and finally Modern English (after 1650), and in Scotland Early Scots (before 1450), Middle Scots (Template:Circa) and Modern Scots (after 1700).

Dialects

The dialects of Old English Template:Circa

Just as Modern English is not monolithic, Old English varied according to place. Despite the diversity of language of the Germanic-speaking migrants who established Old English in England and southeastern Scotland, it is possible to reconstruct proto-Old English as a fairly unitary language. For the most part, the differences between the attested regional dialects of Old English developed within England and southeastern Scotland, rather than on the Mainland of Europe. Although from the tenth century Old English writing from all regions tended to conform to a written standard based on Late West Saxon, in speech Old English continued to exhibit much local and regional variation, which remained in Middle English and to some extent Modern English dialects.

The four main dialectal forms of Old English were Mercian, Northumbrian, Kentish, and West Saxon. Mercian and Northumbrian are together referred to as Anglian. In terms of geography the Northumbrian region lay north of the Humber River; the Mercian lay north of the Thames and south of the Humber River; West Saxon lay south and southwest of the Thames; and the smallest, Kentish region lay southeast of the Thames, a small corner of England. The Kentish region, settled by the Jutes from Jutland, has the scantest literary remains. The term West Saxon actually is represented by two different dialects: Early West Saxon and Late West Saxon. Hogg has suggested that these two dialects would be more appropriately named Alfredian Saxon and Æthelwoldian Saxon, respectively, so that the naive reader would not assume that they are chronologically related.

Each of these four dialects was associated with an independent kingdom on the islands. Of these, Northumbria south of the Tyne, and most of Mercia, were overrun by the Vikings during the 9th century. The portion of Mercia that was successfully defended, and all of Kent, were then integrated into Wessex under Alfred the Great. From that time on, the West Saxon dialect (then in the form now known as Early West Saxon) became standardised as the language of government, and as the basis for the many works of literature and religious materials produced or translated from Latin in that period.

The later literary standard known as Late West Saxon (see Template:Slink), although centred in the same region of the country, appears not to have been directly descended from Alfred's Early West Saxon. For example, the former diphthong Template:IPA tended to become monophthongised to Template:IPA in EWS, but to Template:IPA in LWS.

Due to the centralisation of power and the destruction wrought by Viking invasions, there is relatively little written record of the non-West Saxon dialects after Alfred's unification. Some Mercian texts continued to be written, however, and the influence of Mercian is apparent in some of the translations produced under Alfred's programme, many of which were produced by Mercian scholars. Other dialects certainly continued to be spoken, as is evidenced by the continued variation between their successors in Middle and Modern English. In fact, what would become the standard forms of Middle English and of Modern English are descended from Mercian rather than West Saxon, while Scots developed from the Northumbrian dialect.Template:Citation needed It was once claimed that, owing to its position at the heart of the Kingdom of Wessex, the relics of Anglo-Saxon accent, idiom and vocabulary were best preserved in the dialect of Somerset.

Influence of other languages

Template:Lang ('Here the Word is revealed to thee'). Old English inscription over the arch of the south porticus in the 10th century St Mary's parish church, Breamore, Hampshire

The language of the Anglo-Saxon settlers appears not to have been significantly affected by the native British Celtic languages which it largely displaced. The number of Celtic loanwords introduced into the language is very small, although dialect and toponymic terms are more often retained in western language contact zones (Cumbria, Devon, Welsh Marches and Borders and so on) than in the east. However, various suggestions have been made concerning possible influence that Celtic may have had on developments in English syntax in the post–Old English period, such as the regular progressive construction and analytic word order, as well as the eventual development of the periphrastic auxiliary verb do. These ideas have generally not received widespread support from linguists, particularly as many of the theorised Brittonicisms do not become widespread until the late Middle English and Early Modern English periods, in addition to the fact that similar forms exist in other modern Germanic languages.

Old English contained a certain number of loanwords from Latin, which was the scholarly and diplomatic lingua franca of Western Europe. It is sometimes possible to give approximate dates for the borrowing of individual Latin words based on which patterns of sound change they have undergone. Some Latin words had already been borrowed into the Germanic languages before the ancestral Angles and Saxons left continental Europe for Britain. More entered the language when the Anglo-Saxons were converted to Christianity and Latin-speaking priests became influential. It was also through Irish Christian missionaries that the Latin alphabet was introduced and adapted for the writing of Old English, replacing the earlier runic system. Nonetheless, the largest transfer of Latin-based (mainly Old French) words into English occurred in the Middle English period.

Another source of loanwords was Old Norse, which came into contact with Old English via the Scandinavian rulers and settlers in the Danelaw from the late 9th century, and during the rule of Cnut and other Danish kings in the early 11th century. Many place names in eastern and northern England are of Scandinavian origin. Norse borrowings are relatively rare in Old English literature, being mostly terms relating to government and administration. The literary standard, however, was based on the West Saxon dialect, away from the main area of Scandinavian influence; the impact of Norse may have been greater in the eastern and northern dialects. Certainly in Middle English texts, which are more often based on eastern dialects, a strong Norse influence becomes apparent. Modern English contains many, often everyday, words that were borrowed from Old Norse, and the grammatical simplification that occurred after the Old English period is also often attributed to Norse influence.

The influence of Old Norse certainly helped move English from a synthetic language along the continuum to a more analytic word order, and Old Norse most likely made a greater impact on the English language than any other language. The eagerness of Vikings in the Danelaw to communicate with their Anglo-Saxon neighbours produced a friction that led to the erosion of the complicated inflectional word endings. Simeon Potter notes: Template:Blockquote

The strength of the Viking influence on Old English appears from the fact that the indispensable elements of the languageTemplate:Sndpronouns, modals, comparatives, pronominal adverbs (like hence and together), conjunctions and prepositionsTemplate:Sndshow the most marked Danish influence; the best evidence of Scandinavian influence appears in the extensive word borrowings because, as Jespersen indicates, no texts exist in either Scandinavia or Northern England from this time to give certain evidence of an influence on syntax. The effect of Old Norse on Old English was substantive, pervasive, and of a democratic character. Old Norse and Old English resembled each other closely like cousins, and with some words in common, speakers roughly understood each other; in time the inflections melted away and the analytic pattern emerged. It is most important to recognise that in many words the English and Scandinavian languages differed chiefly in their inflectional elements. The body of the word was so nearly the same in the two languages that only the endings would put obstacles in the way of mutual understanding. In the mixed population which existed in the Danelaw, these endings must have led to much confusion, tending gradually to become obscured and finally lost. This blending of peoples and languages resulted in "simplifying English grammar".

Phonology

Template:Main The inventory of Early West Saxon surface phones is as follows:

Consonants

	Labial	Dental	Alveolar	Post- alveolar	Palatal	Velar	Glottal
Nasal	Template:IPA link		(Template:IPA link) Template:IPA link			(Template:IPA link)
Stop	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link (Template:IPA link)
Affricate				Template:IPA link (Template:IPA link)
Fricative	Template:IPA link (Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link (Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link (Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)
Approximant			(Template:IPA link) Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link	(ʍ) Template:IPA link
Trill			(Template:IPA link) Template:IPA link

The sounds enclosed in parentheses in the chart above are not considered to be phonemes:

• Template:IPA is an allophone of Template:IPA occurring after Template:IPA and when geminated (doubled).
• Template:IPA is an allophone of Template:IPA occurring before [k] and [ɡ].
• Template:IPA are voiced allophones of Template:IPA respectively, occurring between vowels or voiced consonants when the preceding sound was stressed.
• Template:IPA are allophones of Template:IPA occurring at the beginning of a word or after a front vowel, respectively.
• Template:IPA is an allophone of Template:IPA occurring after Template:IPA or when doubled. At some point before the Middle English period, Template:IPA also became the pronunciation word-initially.
• the voiceless sonorants Template:IPA occur after [h] in the sequences Template:IPA.

The above system is largely similar to that of Modern English, except that Template:IPA (and Template:IPA for most speakers) have generally been lost, while the voiced affricate and fricatives (now also including Template:IPA) have become independent phonemes, as has Template:IPA.

Monophthongs

	Front		Back
	unrounded	rounded	unrounded	rounded
Close	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link Template:IPA link
Mid	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link Template:IPA link
Open	Template:IPA link Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)

The open back rounded vowel Template:IPA was an allophone of short /ɑ/ which occurred in stressed syllables before nasal consonants (/m/ and /n/). It was variously spelt either ⟨a⟩ or ⟨o⟩.

The Anglian dialects also had the mid front rounded vowel Template:IPA, spelled ⟨oe⟩, which had emerged from i-umlaut of Template:IPA. In West Saxon and Kentish, it had already merged with Template:IPA before the first written prose.

Diphthongs

First element	Short (monomoraic)	Long (bimoraic)
Close	Template:IPA	Template:IPA
Mid	Template:IPA	Template:IPA
Open	Template:IPA	Template:IPA

Other dialects had different systems of diphthongs. For example, the Northumbrian dialect retained Template:IPA, which had merged with Template:IPA in West Saxon.

Sound changes

Template:Main Some of the principal sound changes occurring in the pre-history and history of Old English were the following:

• Fronting of Template:IPA to Template:IPA except when nasalised or followed by a nasal consonant ("Anglo-Frisian brightening"), partly reversed in certain positions by later "a-restoration" or retraction.
• Monophthongisation of the diphthong Template:IPA, and modification of remaining diphthongs to the height-harmonic type.
• Diphthongisation of long and short front vowels in certain positions ("breaking").
• Palatalisation of velars Template:IPA to Template:IPA in certain front-vowel environments.
• The process known as i-mutation (which for example led to modern mice as the plural of mouse).
• Loss of certain weak vowels in word-final and medial positions; reduction of remaining unstressed vowels.
• Diphthongisation of certain vowels before certain consonants when preceding a back vowel ("back mutation").
• Loss of Template:IPA between vowels or between a voiced consonant and a vowel, with lengthening of the preceding vowel.
• Collapse of two consecutive vowels into a single vowel.
• "Palatal umlaut", which has given forms such as six (compare German Template:Lang).

Grammar

Morphology

Nouns decline for five cases: nominative, accusative, genitive, dative, instrumental; three genders: masculine, feminine, neuter; and two numbers: singular, and plural; and are strong or weak. The instrumental is vestigial and only used with the masculine and neuter singular and often replaced by the dative. Only pronouns and strong adjectives retain separate instrumental forms. There is also sparse early Northumbrian evidence of a sixth case: the locative. The evidence comes from Northumbrian Runic texts (e.g. Template:Lang Template:Lang 'on the Cross').

Adjectives agree with nouns in case, gender, and number, and can be either strong or weak. Pronouns and sometimes participles agree in case, gender, and number. First-person and second-person pronouns occasionally distinguish dual-number forms. The definite article Template:Lang and its inflections serve as a definite article (the), a demonstrative adjective (that), and demonstrative pronoun. Other demonstratives are Template:Lang ("this"), and Template:Lang ("that over there"). These words inflect for case, gender, and number. Adjectives have both strong and weak sets of endings, weak ones being used when a definite or possessive determiner is also present.

Verbs conjugate for three persons: first, second, and third; two numbers: singular, plural; two tenses: present, and past; three moods: indicative, subjunctive, and imperative; and are strong (exhibiting ablaut) or weak (exhibiting a dental suffix). Verbs have two infinitive forms: bare and bound; and two participles: present and past. The subjunctive has past and present forms. Finite verbs agree with subjects in person and number. The future tense, passive voice, and other aspects are formed with compounds. Adpositions are mostly before but are often after their object. If the object of an adposition is marked in the dative case, an adposition may conceivably be located anywhere in the sentence.

Remnants of the Old English case system in Modern English are in the forms of a few pronouns (such as I/me/mine, she/her, who/whom/whose) and in the possessive ending -'s, which derives from the masculine and neuter genitive ending -es. The modern English plural ending -(e)s derives from the Old English -as, but the latter applied only to "strong" masculine nouns in the nominative and accusative cases; different plural endings were used in other instances. Old English nouns had grammatical gender, while modern English has only natural gender. Pronoun usage could reflect either natural or grammatical gender when those conflicted, as in the case of the grammatically neuter (but naturally feminine) noun Template:Lang (Template:IPA), which meant "woman" (from Template:Lang, Template:Lit) and became Modern English wife.

In Old English's verbal compound constructions are the beginnings of the compound tenses of Modern English. Old English verbs include strong verbs, which form the past tense by altering the root vowel, and weak verbs, which use a suffix such as Template:Lang. As in Modern English, and peculiar to the Germanic languages, the verbs formed two great classes: weak (regular), and strong (irregular). Like today, Old English had fewer strong verbs, and many of these have over time decayed into weak forms. Then, as now, dental suffixes indicated the past tense of the weak verbs, as in work and worked.

Syntax

Old English syntax is similar to that of modern English. Some differences are consequences of the greater level of nominal and verbal inflection, allowing freer word order.

• Default word order is verb-second in main clauses, and verb-final in subordinate clauses
• No do-support in questions and negatives. Questions were usually formed by inverting subject and finite verb, and negatives by placing ne before the finite verb, regardless of which verb.
• Multiple negatives can stack up in a sentence intensifying each other (negative concord).
• Sentences with subordinate clauses of the type "when X, Y" (e.g. "When I got home, I ate dinner") do not use a wh-type conjunction, but rather a th-type correlative conjunction such as Template:Lang, otherwise meaning "then" (e.g. Template:Lang in place of "when X, Y"). The wh-words (or "hw-words" in Old English's case) are used only as interrogatives and as indefinite pronouns.
• Similarly, wh-forms were not used as relative pronouns; instead, the indeclinable word Template:Lang is used, often preceded by (or replaced by) the appropriate form of the article/demonstrative Template:Lang.

Orthography

The runic alphabet used to write Old English before the introduction of the Latin alphabet

Old English was first written in runes, using the futhorcTemplate:Snda rune set derived from the Germanic 24-character elder futhark, extended by five more runes used to represent Anglo-Saxon vowel sounds and sometimes by several more additional characters. From around the 8th century, the runic system came to be supplanted by a (minuscule) half-uncial script of the Latin alphabet introduced by Irish Christian missionaries. This was replaced by Insular script, a cursive and pointed version of the half-uncial script. This was used until the end of the 12th century when continental Carolingian minuscule (also known as Caroline) replaced the insular.

The Latin alphabet of the time still lacked the letters Template:Vr and Template:Vr, and there was no Template:Vr as distinct from Template:Vr; moreover native Old English spellings did not use Template:Vr, Template:Vr or Template:Vr. The remaining 20 Latin letters were supplemented by 4 more: Template:Vr (Template:Lang, modern ash) and Template:Vr (Template:Lang, now called eth or edh), which were modified Latin letters, and thorn Template:Vr and wynn Template:Vr, which are borrowings from the futhorc. A few letter pairs were used as digraphs, representing a single sound. Also used was the Tironian note Template:Vr (a character similar to the digit Template:Vr) for the conjunction and. A common scribal abbreviation was a thorn with a stroke Template:Vr, which was used for the pronoun Template:Lang (that). Macrons over vowels were originally used not to mark long vowels (as in modern editions), but to indicate stress, or as abbreviations for a following Template:Vr or Template:Vr.

Modern editions of Old English manuscripts generally introduce some additional conventions. The modern forms of Latin letters are used, including Template:Vr instead of insular G, Template:Vr instead of insular S and long S, and others which may differ considerably from the insular script, notably Template:Vr, Template:Vr and Template:Vr. Macrons are used to indicate long vowels, where usually no distinction was made between long and short vowels in the originals. (In some older editions an acute accent mark was used for consistency with Old Norse conventions.) Additionally, modern editions often distinguish between velar and palatal Template:Vr and Template:Vr by placing dots above the palatals: Template:Vr, Template:Vr. The letter wynn Template:Vr is usually replaced with Template:Vr, but Template:Vr, Template:Vr and Template:Vr are normally retainedTemplate:Sndexcept when Template:Vr is replaced by Template:Vr.

In contrast with modern English orthography, Old English spelling was reasonably regular, with a mostly predictable correspondence between letters and phonemes. There were not usually any silent lettersTemplate:Sndin the word Template:Lang, for example, both the Template:Vr and Template:Vr were pronounced (Template:IPA) unlike the Template:Vr and Template:Vr in the modern knight (Template:IPA).

OE	Variants in modern editions	IPA transcription	Notes
a	a	Template:IPA	Spelling variations like Template:Vr ~ Template:Vr ("land") suggest the short vowel had a rounded allophone Template:IPA before Template:IPA and Template:IPA when it occurred in stressed syllables.
	ā	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
æ	æ	Template:IPA	Formerly the digraph Template:Vr was used; Template:Vr became more common during the 8th century, and was standard after 800. Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
	ǣ	Template:IPA
	ę	Template:IPA, Template:IPA	In 9th-century Kentish manuscripts, a form of Template:Vr that was missing the upper hook of the Template:Vr part was used; it is not clear whether this represented Template:IPA or Template:IPA. The symbol Template:Vr is used as a modern editorial substitution for the modified Kentish form of Template:Vr. Compare e caudata, Template:Vr.
b		Template:IPA
		Template:IPA (an allophone of Template:IPA)	Used in this way in early texts (before 800). For example, the word sheaves is spelled Template:Lang in an early text, but later (and more commonly) as Template:Lang.
c	c	Template:IPA	The Template:IPA pronunciation is sometimes written with a diacritic by modern editors: most commonly Template:Vr, sometimes Template:Vr or Template:Vr. Before a consonant letter the pronunciation is always Template:IPA; word-finally after Template:Vr it is always Template:IPA. Otherwise, a knowledge of the history of the word is needed to predict the pronunciation with certainty, although it is most commonly Template:IPA before front vowels (other than Template:IPA) and Template:IPA elsewhere.
	ċ	Template:IPA
cg	cg	Template:IPA (between vowels; rare), Template:IPA (after Template:IPA)	Proto-Germanic *g was palatalized when it underwent West Germanic gemination, resulting in the voiced palatal geminate Template:IPA (which can be phonemically analyzed as Template:IPA). Consequently, the voiced velar geminate Template:IPA (which can be phonemically analyzed as Template:IPA) was rare in Old English, and its etymological origin in the words in which it occurs (such as Template:Lang 'frog') is unclear. Alternative spellings of either geminate included Template:Vr, Template:Vr, Template:Vr, Template:Vr and Template:Vr. The two geminates were not distinguished in Old English orthography; in modern editions, the palatal geminate is sometimes written Template:Vr to distinguish it from velar Template:Vr. After Template:IPA, Template:IPA was realized as Template:IPA and Template:IPA was realized as Template:IPA. The spellings Template:Vr, Template:Vr and even Template:Vr were occasionally used instead of the usual Template:Vr. The addition of Template:Vr to Template:Vr in spellings such as Template:Vr and Template:Vr for Template:Vr may have been a means of showing that the word was pronounced with a stop rather than a fricative; spellings with just Template:Vr such as Template:Vr are also found. To disambiguate, the cluster ending in the palatal affricate is sometimes written Template:Vr (or Template:Vr) by modern editors.
	ċġ	Template:IPA (between vowels), Template:IPA (after Template:IPA)
d		Template:IPA	In the earliest texts it also represented Template:IPA. See Template:Vr.
ð	ð, þ	Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA	Called Template:Lang in Old English; now called eth or edh. Derived from the insular form of Template:Vr with the addition of a cross-bar. Both Template:Vr and Template:Vr could represent either allophone of Template:IPA, voiceless Template:IPA or voiced Template:IPA, but some texts show a tendency to use Template:Vr at the start of words and Template:Vr in the middle or at the end of a word. Some modern editors replace Template:Vr with Template:Vr as a form of normalization and means of imposing consistency. See Template:Vr.
e	e	Template:IPA
	ē	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
ea	ea	Template:IPA	Sometimes stands for Template:IPA after Template:Vr or Template:Vr
	ēa	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA. Sometimes stands for Template:IPA after Template:Vr or Template:Vr.
eo	eo	Template:IPA	Sometimes stands for Template:IPA after Template:Vr or Template:Vr
	ēo	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
f		Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA	See also Template:Vr.
g	g	Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA	In Old English manuscripts, this letter usually took its insular form Template:Vr. The Template:IPA and Template:IPA pronunciations are sometimes written Template:Vr in modern editions. Word-initially before another consonant letter, the pronunciation is always the velar fricative Template:IPA. Word-finally after Template:Angle bracket, it is always palatal Template:IPA. Otherwise, a knowledge of the history of the word in question is needed to predict the pronunciation with certainty, although it is most commonly Template:IPA before and after front vowels (other than Template:IPA) and Template:IPA elsewhere.
	ġ	Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA, which occurs after Template:Vr
h		Template:IPA, including its allophones Template:IPA	The combinations Template:Vr, Template:Vr, Template:Vr, Template:Vr may have been realized as devoiced versions of the second consonants instead of as sequences starting with Template:IPA.
i	i	Template:IPA, rarely Template:IPA	Although the spelling Template:Vr is used for the palatal consonant Template:IPA from the earliest Old English texts, the letter Template:Vr is also found as a minority spelling of Template:IPA. West Saxon scribes came to prefer to use Template:Vr rather than Template:Vr to spell the Template:IPA sequence found in verbs like herian and swerian, whereas Mercian and Northumbrian texts generally used Template:Vr in the spelling of these words.
	ī	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
ie	ie	Template:IPA
	īe	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
io	io	Template:IPA	By the time of the first written prose, Template:IPA had merged with Template:IPA in every dialect but Northumbrian, where it was preserved until Middle English. In Early West Saxon Template:IPA was often written Template:Vr instead of Template:Vr, but by Late West Saxon only the Template:Vr spelling remained common.
	īo	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
k		Template:IPA	Rarely used; this sound is normally represented by Template:Vr.
l		Template:IPA	Probably velarised Template:IPA (as in Modern English) when in coda position.
m		Template:IPA
n		Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA	The allophone Template:IPA occurred before a velar plosive (Template:IPA or Template:IPA).
o	o	Template:IPA	See also Template:Vr.
	ō	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
oe	oe, œ	Template:IPA	Only occurs in some dialects. Written as Template:Vr in Old English manuscripts, but some modern editions use the ligature Template:Vr to indicate that it is a single vowel sound. Modern editions use Template:Vr or Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
	ōe, œ̄	Template:IPA
p		Template:IPA
qu		Template:IPA	A rare spelling of Template:IPA, which was usually written as Template:Vr (Template:Vr in modern editions).
r		Template:IPA	The exact nature of Old English Template:IPA is not known; it may have been an alveolar approximant Template:IPA as in most modern English, an alveolar flap Template:IPA, or an alveolar trill Template:IPA.
s		Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA
sc	sc	Template:IPA (rare)	At the start of a word, the usual pronunciation is palatalized Template:Lang Template:IPA. Between vowels in the middle of a word, the pronunciation can be either a palatalized geminate Template:IPA, as in Template:Lang Template:IPA ('fisherman') and Template:Lang, Template:IPA ('to wish'), or an unpalatalized consonant sequence Template:IPA, as in Template:Lang Template:IPA ('to ask'). The pronunciation Template:IPA occurs when Template:Vr had been followed by a back vowel (Template:IPA, Template:IPA, Template:IPA) at the time of palatalization, as illustrated by the contrast between Template:Lang Template:IPA ('fish') and its plural Template:Lang Template:IPA. But due to changes over time, a knowledge of the history of the word in question is needed to predict the pronunciation with certainty. In word-final position, the pronunciation of Template:Lang was either Template:IPA or possibly Template:IPA when the preceding vowel was short.
	sċ	Template:IPA (between vowels), Template:IPA (elsewhere)
t		Template:IPA
th		Template:IPA	Represented Template:IPA in the earliest texts (see Template:Vr)
þ		Template:IPA, including its allophone Template:IPA	Called thorn and derived from a rune of the same name. In the earliest texts Template:Vr or Template:Vr was used for this phoneme, but these were later replaced in this function by eth Template:Vr and thorn Template:Vr. Eth was first attested (in definitely dated materials) in the 7th century, and thorn in the 8th. Eth was more common than thorn before the time of Alfred. From then onward, thorn was used increasingly often at the start of words, while eth was normal in the middle and at the end of words, although usage varied in both cases. Some modern editions use only thorn.
u	u	Template:IPA, also sometimes Template:IPA. See Template:Vr.
	ū	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
uu	w	Template:IPA	Old English manuscripts typically represented the sound Template:IPA with the letter Template:Vr, called wynn and derived from the rune of the same name. In earlier texts by continental scribes, and also later in the north, Template:IPA was represented by Template:Vr or Template:Vr. In modern editions, wynn is replaced by Template:Vr, to prevent confusion with Template:Vr.
ƿ
x		Template:IPA
y	y	Template:IPA
	ȳ	Template:IPA	Modern editions use Template:Vr to distinguish long Template:IPA from short Template:IPA.
z		Template:IPA	A rare spelling for Template:IPA; e.g. Template:Lang ('best') is occasionally spelt Template:Lang.

Doubled consonants are geminated; the geminate fricatives Template:Vr, Template:Vr and Template:Vr/Template:Vr/Template:Vr/Template:Vr are always voiceless Template:IPA, Template:IPA, Template:IPA.

Literature

The first page of the Beowulf manuscript with its opening
Template:Lang
"Listen! We of the Spear-Danes from days of yore have heard of the glory of the nation-kings..."

The corpus of Old English literature is small but still significant, with some 400 surviving manuscripts. The pagan and Christian streams mingle in Old English, one of the richest and most significant bodies of literature preserved among the early Germanic peoples. In his supplementary article to the 1935 posthumous edition of Bright's Anglo-Saxon Reader, James Hulbert writes:

Some of the most important surviving works of Old English literature are Beowulf, an epic poem; the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, a record of early English history; the Franks Casket, an inscribed early whalebone artefact; and Cædmon's Hymn, a Christian religious poem. There are also a number of extant prose works, such as sermons and saints' lives, biblical translations, and translated Latin works of the early Church Fathers, legal documents, such as laws and wills, and practical works on grammar, medicine, and geography. Still, poetry is considered the heart of Old English literature. Nearly all Anglo-Saxon authors are anonymous, with a few exceptions, such as Bede and Cædmon. Cædmon, the earliest English poet known by name, served as a lay brother in the monastery at Whitby.

Beowulf

Template:Original research section The first example is taken from the opening lines of Beowulf, a work with around 3,000 lines. This passage describes how Hrothgar's legendary ancestor Scyld was found as a baby, washed ashore, and adopted by a noble family. The translation is literal and represents the original poetic word order. As such, it is not typical of Old English prose. The modern cognates of original words have been used whenever practical to give a close approximation of the feel of the original poem.

The words in brackets are implied in the Old English by noun case and the bold words in brackets are explanations of words that have slightly different meanings in a modern context. What is used by the poet where a word like lo or behold would be expected. This usage is similar to what-ho!, both an expression of surprise and a call to attention.

English poetry is based on stress and alliteration. In alliteration, the first consonant in a word alliterates with the same consonant at the beginning of another word, as with Template:Lang and Template:Lang. Vowels alliterate with any other vowel, as with Template:Lang and Template:Lang. In the text below, the letters that alliterate are bolded.

Template:Numero	Original	Representation with constructed cognates
1	Template:Lang	What! We of Gare-Danes (lit. Spear-Danes) in yore-days,
	Template:Lang	of thede (nation/people)-kings, did thrum (glory) frain (learn about by asking),
	Template:Lang	how those athelings (noblemen) did ellen (fortitude/courage/zeal) freme (promote).
	Template:Lang	Oft did Scyld Scefing of scather threats (troops),
5	Template:Lang	of many maegths (clans; cf. Irish cognate Mac-), of meadsettees atee (deprive),
	Template:Lang	[and] ugg (induce loathing in, terrify; related to "ugly") earls. Sith (since, as of when) erst (first) [he] worthed (became)
	Template:Lang	[in] fewship (destitute) found, he of this frover (comfort) abode,
	Template:Lang	[and] waxed under welkin (firmament/clouds), [and amid] worthmint (honour/worship) theed (throve/prospered)
	Template:Lang	oth that (until that) him each of those umsitters (those "sitting" or dwelling roundabout)
10	Template:Lang	over whaleroad (kenning for "sea") hear should,
	Template:Lang	[and] yeme (heed/obedience; related to "gormless") yield. That was [a] good king!

Here is a natural enough Modern English translation, although the phrasing of the Old English passage has often been stylistically preserved, even though it is not usual in Modern English:

The Lord's Prayer

Template:Original research section File:Faederureaudio2.ogg Template:Clear This text of the Lord's Prayer is presented in the standardised Early West Saxon dialect.

Line	Original	IPA	Word-for-word translation into Modern English	Translation
1	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	Father Ours, thou which art in heavens,	Our Father, who art in heaven,
2	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	Be thine name hallowed.	Hallowed be thy name.
3	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	To be come [is] thine kingdom,	Thy kingdom come,
4	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	Let there be thine will, on earth so so in heavens.	Thy will be done on earth as in heaven.
5	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	Our daily loaf sell us today,	Give us this day our daily bread,
6	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	And forgive us our guilts, so so we forgiveth our guilters.	And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
7	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	And not lead thou us in costening, but alease us of evil.	And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.
8	Template:Lang	Template:IPA	Soothly.	Amen.

Charter of Cnut

This is a proclamation from Cnut to his earl Thorkell the Tall and the English people written in AD 1019. Unlike the previous two examples, this text is prose rather than poetry. For ease of reading, the passage has been divided into sentences while the pilcrows represent the original division.

Original	Representation with constructed cognates
¶ Template:Lang	¶ Cnut, king, greets his archbishops and his lede'(people's)'-bishops and Thorkell, earl, and all his earls and all his peopleship, greater (having a 1200 shilling weregild) and lesser (200 shilling weregild), hooded(ordained to priesthood) and lewd(lay), in England friendly.
Template:Lang	And I kithe(make known/couth to) you, that I will be [a] hold(civilised) lord and unswiking(uncheating) to God's rights(laws) and to [the] rights(laws) worldly.
¶ Template:Lang	¶ I nam(took) me to mind the writs and the word that the Archbishop Lyfing me from the Pope brought of Rome, that I should ayewhere(everywhere) God's love(praise) uprear(promote), and unright(outlaw) lies, and full frith(peace) work(bring about) by the might that me God would(wished) [to] sell'(give).
¶ Template:Lang	¶ Now, ne went(withdrew/changed) I not my shot(financial contribution, cf. Norse cognate in scot-free) the while that you stood(endured) unfrith(turmoil) on-hand: now I, mid(with) God's support, that [unfrith] totwemed(separated/dispelled) mid(with) my shot(financial contribution).
Template:Lang	Tho(then) [a] man kithed(made known/couth to) me that us more harm had found(come upon) than us well liked(equalled): and tho(then) fore(travelled) I, meself, mid(with) those men that mid(with) me fore(travelled), into Denmark that [to] you most harm came of(from): and that[harm] have [I], mid(with) God's support, afore(previously) forefangen(forestalled) that to you never henceforth thence none unfrith(breach of peace) ne come the while that ye me rightly hold(behold as king) and my life beeth.

The following is a natural Modern English translation, with the overall structure of the Old English passage preserved. Even though "earl" is used to translate its Old English cognate "eorl", "eorl" in Old English does not correspond exactly to "earl" of the later medieval period:

Dictionaries

Early history

The earliest history of Old English lexicography lies in the Anglo-Saxon period itself, when English-speaking scholars created English glosses on Latin texts. At first, these were often marginal or interlinear glosses; however, they soon came to be gathered into word-lists such as the Épinal-Erfurt, Leiden and Corpus Glossaries. Over time, these word-lists were consolidated and alphabetised to create extensive Latin–Old English glossaries with some of the character of dictionaries, such as the Cleopatra Glossaries, the Harley Glossary and the Brussels Glossary. In some cases, the material in these glossaries continued to be circulated and updated in Middle English glossaries, such as the Durham Plant-Name Glossary and the Laud Herbal Glossary.

Old English lexicography was revived in the early modern period, drawing heavily on Anglo-Saxons' own glossaries. The major publication at this time was William Somner's Dictionarium Saxonico-Latino-Anglicum. The next substantial Old English dictionary was Joseph Bosworth's Anglo-Saxon Dictionary of 1838.

Modern

In modern scholarship, the following dictionaries remain current:

• Cameron, Angus, et al. (ed.) (1983–). Dictionary of Old English. Toronto: Published for the Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto by the Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies. Initially issued on microfiche and subsequently as a CD-ROM, the dictionary is now primarily published online at https://www.doe.utoronto.ca. This generally supersedes previous dictionaries where available. As of September 2018, the dictionary covered A-I.
• Bosworth, Joseph and T. Northcote Toller. (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon. The main research dictionary for Old English, unless superseded by the Dictionary of Old English. Various digitisations are available open-access, including at http://bosworth.ff.cuni.cz/. Due to errors and omissions in the 1898 publication, this needs to be read in conjunction with:
  • T. Northcote Toller. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Alistair Campbell (1972). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Enlarged addenda and corrigenda. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Clark Hall, J. R. (1969). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 4th rev. edn by Herbet D. Meritt. Cambridge University Press. Occasionally more accurate than Bosworth-Toller, and widely used as a reading dictionary. Various digitisations are available, including here.
• Roberts, Jane and Christian Kay, with Lynne Grundy, A Thesaurus of Old English in Two Volumes, Costerus New Series, 131–32, 2nd rev. impression, 2 vols (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000), also available online. A thesaurus based on the definitions in Bosworth-Toller and the structure of Roget's Thesaurus.

Though focused on later periods, the Oxford English Dictionary, Middle English Dictionary, Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue, and Historical Thesaurus of English all also include material relevant to Old English.

Modern legacy

Like other historical languages, Old English has been used by scholars and enthusiasts of later periods to create texts either imitating Old English literature or deliberately transferring it to a different cultural context. Examples include Alistair Campbell and J. R. R. Tolkien. Ransom Riggs uses several Old English words, such as syndrigast (singular, peculiar), ymbryne (period, cycle), etc., dubbed as "Old Peculiar" ones. Advocates of linguistic purism in English often look to older forms of English, including Old English, as a means of either reviving old words or coining new ones.

A number of websites devoted to Modern Paganism and historical reenactment offer reference material and forums promoting the active use of Old English. There is also an Old English version of Wikipedia. However, one investigation found that many Neo-Old English texts published online bear little resemblance to the historical language and have many basic grammatical mistakes.

See also

• Anglish
• Exeter Book
• Go (verb)
• History of the Scots language
• I-mutation
• Ingvaeonic nasal spirant law
• List of generic forms in place names in the United Kingdom and Ireland
• List of Germanic and Latinate equivalents in English

Bibliography

• Template:Cite book

General

• Template:Cite book
• Baugh, Albert C.; & Cable, Thomas. (1993). A History of the English Language (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
• Blake, Norman (1992). The Cambridge History of the English Language: Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
• Campbell, A. (1959). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Template:Cite book (Reissue of one of 4 eds. 1877–1902)
• Euler, Wolfram (2013). Template:Lang [West Germanic: from its Emergence in the 3rd up until its Dissolution in the 7th century CE: Analyses and Reconstruction]. 244 p., in German with English summary, London/Berlin 2013, Template:ISBN.
• Template:Cite book
• Hogg, Richard M. (ed.). (1992). The Cambridge History of the English Language: (Vol 1): the Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge University Press.
• Hogg, Richard; & Denison, David (eds.) (2006) A History of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
• Jespersen, Otto (1909–1949) A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. Heidelberg: C. Winter & Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard
• Lass, Roger (1987) The Shape of English: structure and history. London: J. M. Dent & Sons
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite book
• Quirk, Randolph; & Wrenn, C. L. (1957). An Old English Grammar (2nd ed.) London: Methuen.
• Ringe, Donald R. and Taylor, Ann (2014). The Development of Old English: A Linguistic History of English, vol. II, Template:ISBN. Oxford.
• Strang, Barbara M. H. (1970) A History of English. London: Methuen.

External history

• Template:Cite book
• Bremmer Jr, Rolf H. (2009). An Introduction to Old Frisian. History, Grammar, Reader, Glossary. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Stenton, F. M. (1971). Anglo-Saxon England (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.

Orthography and palaeography

• Bourcier, Georges. (1978). Template:Lang. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
• Elliott, Ralph W. V. (1959). Runes: An introduction. Manchester University Press.
• Keller, Wolfgang. (1906). Angelsächsische Paleographie, I: Einleitung. Berlin: Mayer & Müller.
• Ker, N. R. (1957). A Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Ker, N. R. (1990) [1957]. A Catalogue of Manuscripts Containing Anglo-Saxon; with supplement prepared by Neil Ker originally published in. Anglo-Saxon England; 5, 1957. Oxford: Clarendon Template:ISBN
• Page, R. I. (1973). An Introduction to English Runes. London: Methuen.
• Scragg, Donald G. (1974). A History of English Spelling. Manchester University Press.
• Shaw, Philip A. (2012). "Coins As Evidence". The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Chapter 3, pp. 50–52. Edited by Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott.
• Wełna, Jerzy (1986). "The Old English Digraph Template:Angle bracket Again". Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries: Vol 1: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics, pp. 753–762. Edited by Dieter Kastovsky and Aleksander Szwedek.

Phonology

• Anderson, John M.; & Jones, Charles. (1977). Phonological structure and the history of English. North-Holland linguistics series (No. 33). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Brunner, Karl. (1965). Template:Lang (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Campbell, A. (1959). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Cercignani, Fausto (1983). "The Development of */k/ and */sk/ in Old English". Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 82 (3): 313–323.
• Girvan, Ritchie. (1931). Angelsaksisch Handboek; E. L. Deuschle (transl.). (Oudgermaansche Handboeken; No. 4). Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink.
• Halle, Morris; & Keyser, Samuel J. (1971). English Stress: its form, its growth, and its role in verse. New York: Harper & Row.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite book
• Template:Cite journal
• Kuhn, Sherman M. (1970). "On the consonantal phonemes of Old English". In: J. L. Rosier (ed.) Philological Essays: studies in Old and Middle English language and literature in honour of Herbert Dean Merritt (pp. 16–49). The Hague: Mouton.
• Lass, Roger; & Anderson, John M. (1975). Old English Phonology. (Cambridge studies in linguistics; No. 14). Cambridge University Press.
• Luick, Karl. (1914–1940). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Bernhard Tauchnitz.
• Template:Cite journal
• Template:Cite journal
• Minkova, Donka (2014). A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh University Press.
• Moulton, W. G. (1972). "The Proto-Germanic non-syllabics (consonants)". In: F. van Coetsem & H. L. Kufner (Eds.), Toward a Grammar of Proto-Germanic (pp. 141–173). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Sievers, Eduard (1893). Template:Lang. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
• Wagner, Karl Heinz (1969). Generative Grammatical Studies in the Old English language. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.

Morphology

• Brunner, Karl. (1965). Template:Lang (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Wagner, Karl Heinz. (1969). Generative grammatical studies in the Old English language. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.

Syntax

• Brunner, Karl. (1962). Template:Lang (Vol. II). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Kemenade, Ans van. (1982). Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
• MacLaughlin, John C. (1983). Old English Syntax: a handbook. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Mitchell, Bruce. (1985). Old English Syntax (Vols. 1–2). Oxford: Clarendon (no more published)
  • Vol. 1: Concord, the parts of speech and the sentence
  • Vol. 2: Subordination, independent elements, and element order
• Mitchell, Bruce. (1990) A Critical Bibliography of Old English Syntax to the end of 1984, including addenda and corrigenda to "Old English Syntax". Oxford: Blackwell
• Timofeeva, Olga. (2010) Non-finite Constructions in Old English, with Special Reference to Syntactic Borrowing from Latin, PhD dissertation, Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, vol. LXXX, Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1972). A History of English Syntax: a transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Visser, F. Th. (1963–1973). An Historical Syntax of the English Language (Vols. 1–3). Leiden: Brill.

Lexicons

• Bosworth, J.; & Toller, T. Northcote. (1898). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon. (Based on Bosworth's 1838 dictionary, his papers & additions by Toller)
• Toller, T. Northcote. (1921). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Supplement. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Campbell, A. (1972). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Enlarged addenda and corrigenda. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Clark Hall, J. R.; & Merritt, H. D. (1969). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Cameron, Angus, et al. (ed.) (1983) Dictionary of Old English. Toronto: Published for the Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto by the Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1983/1994. (Issued on microfiche and subsequently as a CD-ROM and on the World Wide Web.)

External links

Dictionaries

• Bosworth and Toller, An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online
• Template:Webarchive
• Template:Webarchive
• Dictionary of Old English

Lessons

• Old English Online by Jonathan Slocum and Winfred P. Lehmann, free online lessons at the Linguistics Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin
• Template:Webarchive
• Template:Webarchive